| the seed, and in the maintenance of the | |||
| farmer's family, servants, and cattle, during | |||
| at least a great part of the first year of his occupancy, | |||
| or till he can receive some return | |||
| from the land. The annual expenses consist | |||
| in the seed, in the wear and tear of instruments | |||
| of husbandry, and in the annual maintenance | |||
| of the farmer's servants and cattle, | |||
| and of his family too, so far as any part of | |||
| them can be considered as servants employed | |||
| in cultivation. That part of the produce of | |||
| the land which remains to him after paying | |||
| the rent, ought to be sufficient, first, to replace | |||
| to him, within a reasonable time, at | |||
| least during the term of his occupancy, the | |||
| whole of his original expenses, together with | |||
| the ordinary profits of stock; and, secondly, | |||
| to replace to him annually the whole | |||
| of his annual expenses, together likewise | |||
| with the ordinary profits of stock. Those two | |||
| sorts of expenses are two capitals which the | |||
| farmer employs in cultivation; and unless | |||
| they are regularly restored to him, together | |||
| with a reasonable profit, he cannot carry on | |||
| his employment upon a level with other employments; | |||
| but, from a regard to his own | |||
| interest, must desert it as soon as possible, | |||
| and see some other. That part of the produce | |||
| of the land which is thus necessary for | |||
| enabling the farmer to continue his business, | |||
| ought to be considered as a fund sacred to | |||
| cultivation, which, if the landlord violates, | |||
| he necessarily reduces the produce of his own | |||
| land, and, in a few years, not only disables | |||
| the farmer from paying this racked rent, but | |||
| from paying the reasonable rent which he | |||
| might otherwise have got for his land. The | |||
| rent which properly belongs to the landlord, | |||
| is no more than the neat produce which remains | |||
| after paying, in the completest manner, | |||
| all the necessary expenses which must be previously | |||
| laid out, in order to raise the gross or | |||
| the whole produce. It is because the labour | |||
| of the cultivators, over and above paying | |||
| completely all those necessary expenses, affords | |||
| a neat produce of this kind, that this | |||
| class of people are in this system peculiarly | |||
| distinguished by the honourable appellation | |||
| of the productive class. Their original and | |||
| annual expenses are for the same reason called, | |||
| in this system, productive expenses, because, | |||
| over and above replacing their own | |||
| value, they occasion the annual reproduction | |||
| of this neat produce. | |||
| The ground expenses, as they are called, | |||
| or what the landlord lays out upon the improvement | |||
| of his land, are, in this system, | |||
| too, honoured with the appellation of productive | |||
| expenses. Till the whole of those expenses, | |||
| together with the ordinary profits of | |||
| stock, have been completely repaid to him by | |||
| the advanced rent which he gets from his | |||
| land, that advanced rent ought to be regarded | |||
| as sacred and inviolable, both by the | |||
| church and by the king; ought to be subject | |||
| neither to tithe nor to taxation. If it is otherwise, | |||
| by discouraging the improvement of | |||
| land, the church discourages the future increase | |||
| of her own tithes, and the king the future | |||
| increase of his own taxes. As in a well | |||
| ordered state of things, therefore, those ground | |||
| expenses, over and above reproducing in the | |||
| completest manner their own value, occasion | |||
| likewise, after a certain time, a reproduction | |||
| of neat produce, they are in this system | |||
| considered as productive expenses. | |||
| The ground expenses of the landlord, however, | |||
| together with the original and the annual | |||
| expenses of the farmer, are the only | |||
| three sorts of expenses which in this system | |||
| are considered as productive. All other expenses, | |||
| and all other orders of people, even | |||
| those who, in the common apprehensions of | |||
| men, are regarded as the most productive, | |||
| are, in this account of things, represented as | |||
| altogether barren and unproductive. | |||
| Artificers and manufacturers, in particular, | |||
| whose industry, in the common apprehensions | |||
| of men, increases so much the value of the | |||
| rude produce of land, are in this system represented | |||
| as a class of people altogether | |||
| barren and unproductive. Their labour, it is | |||
| said, replaces only the stock which employs | |||
| them, together with its ordinary profits. | |||
| That stock consists in the materials, tools, | |||
| and wages, advanced to them by their employer; | |||
| and is the fund destined for their | |||
| employment and maintenance. Its profits | |||
| are the fund destined for the maintenance of | |||
| their employer. Their employer, as he advances | |||
| to them the stock of materials, tools, | |||
| and wages, necessary for their employment, | |||
| so he advances to himself what is necessary | |||
| for his own maintenance; and this maintenance | |||
| he generally proportions to the profit | |||
| which he expects to make by the price of their | |||
| work. Unless its price repays to him the | |||
| maintenance which he advances to himself, as | |||
| well as the materials, tools, and wages, which | |||
| he advances to his workmen, it evidently does | |||
| not repay to him the whole expense which he | |||
| lays out upon it. The profits of manufacturing | |||
| stock, therefore, are not, like the rent | |||
| of land, a neat produce which remains after | |||
| completely repaying the whole expense which | |||
| must be laid out in order to obtain them. | |||
| The stock of the farmer yields him a profit, | |||
| as well as that of the master manufacturer; | |||
| and it yields a rent likewise to another person, | |||
| which that of the master manufacturer does | |||
| not. The expense, therefore, laid out in employing | |||
| and maintaining artificers and manufacturers, | |||
| does no more than continue, if one | |||
| may say so, the existence of its own value, | |||
| and does not produce any new value. It is, | |||
| therefore, altogether a barren and unproductive | |||
| expense. The expense, on the contrary, | |||
| laid out in employing farmers and country | |||
| labourers, over and above continuing the existence | |||
| of its own value, produces a new value | |||