stock is likely to go from any other profession | |||
to the improvement of land in the way of | |||
farming. More does, perhaps, in Great Britain | |||
than in any other country, though even | |||
there the great stocks which are in some places | |||
employed in farming, have generally been acquired | |||
by farming, the trade, perhaps, in which, | |||
of all others, stock is commonly acquired most | |||
slowly. After small proprietors, however, | |||
rich and great farmers are in every country | |||
the principal improvers. There are more such, | |||
perhaps, in England than in any other European | |||
monarchy. In the republican governments | |||
of Holland, and of Berne in Switzerland, | |||
the farmers are said to be not inferior to those | |||
of England. | |||
The ancient policy of Europe was, over and | |||
above all this, unfavourable to the improvement | |||
and cultivation of land, whether carried | |||
on by the proprietor or by the farmer; first, | |||
by the general prohibition of the exportation | |||
of corn, without a special licence, which seems | |||
to have been a very universal regulation; and, | |||
secondly, by the restraints which were laid upon | |||
the inland commerce, not only of corn, but | |||
of almost every other part of the produce of | |||
the farm, by the absurd laws against engrossers, | |||
regraters, and forestallers, and by the privileges | |||
of fairs and markets. It has already | |||
been observed in what manner the prohibition | |||
of the exportation of corn, together with some | |||
encouragement given to the importation of foreign | |||
corn, obstructed the cultivation of ancient | |||
Italy, naturally the most fertile country | |||
in Europe, and at that time the seat of the | |||
greatest empire in the world. To what degree | |||
such restraints upon the inland commerce | |||
of this commodity, joined to the general prohibition | |||
of exportation, must have discouraged | |||
the cultivation of countries less fertile, and | |||
less favourably circumstanced, it is not, perhaps, | |||
very easy to imagine. | |||
CHAP. III. | |||
OF THE RISE AND PROGRESS OF CITIES AND | |||
TOWNS, AFTER THE FALL OF THE ROMAN | |||
EMPIRE. | |||
The inhabitants of cities and towns were, after | |||
the fall of the Roman empire, not more | |||
favoured than those of the country. They | |||
consisted, indeed, of a very different order of | |||
people from the first inhabitants of the ancient | |||
republics of Greece and Italy. These | |||
last were composed chiefly of the proprietors | |||
of lands, among whom the public territory | |||
was originally divided, and who found it convenient | |||
to build their houses in the neighbourhood | |||
of one another, and to surround | |||
them with a wall, for the sake of common defence. | |||
After the fall of the Roman empire, | |||
on the contrary, the proprietors of land seem | |||
generally to have lived in fortified castles on | |||
their own estates, and in the midst of their | |||
own tenants and dependents. The towns were | |||
chiefly inhabited by tradesmen and mechanics, | |||
who seem, in those days, to have been of servile, | |||
or very nearly of servile condition. The | |||
privileges which we find granted by ancient | |||
charters to the inhabitants of some of the principal | |||
towns in Europe, sufficiently show what | |||
they were before those grants. The people | |||
to whom it is granted as a privilege, that they | |||
might give away their own daughters in marriage | |||
without the consent of their lord, that | |||
upon their death their own children, and not | |||
their lord, should succeed to their goods, and | |||
that they might dispose of their own effects by | |||
will, must, before those grants, have been either | |||
altogether, or very nearly, in the same | |||
state of villanage with the occupiers of land | |||
in the country. | |||
They seem, indeed, to have been a very | |||
poor, mean set of people, who seemed to travel | |||
about with their goods from place to place | |||
and from fair to fair, like the hawkers and | |||
pedlars of the present times. In all the different | |||
countries of Europe then, in the same | |||
manner as in several of the Tartar governments | |||
of Asia at present, taxes used to be levied | |||
upon the persons and goods of travellers, | |||
when they passed through certain manors, | |||
when they went over certain bridges, when | |||
they carried about their goods from place to | |||
place in a fair, when they erected in it a booth | |||
or stall to sell them in. These different taxes | |||
were known in England by the names of passage, | |||
pontage, lastage, and stallage. Sometimes | |||
the king, sometimes a great lord, who | |||
had, it seems, upon some occasions, authority | |||
to do this, would grant to particular traders, | |||
to such particularly as lived in their own demesnes, | |||
a general exemption from such taxes. | |||
Such traders, though in other respects of servile, | |||
or very nearly of servile condition, were | |||
upon this account called free traders. They, | |||
in return, usually paid to their protector a | |||
sort of annual poll-tax. In those days protection | |||
was seldom granted without a valuable | |||
consideration, and this tax might perhaps | |||
be considered as compensation for what their | |||
patrons might lose by their exemption from | |||
other taxes. At first, both those poll-taxes | |||
and those exemptions seem to have been altogether | |||
personal, and to have affected only particular | |||
individuals, during either their lives, or | |||
the pleasure of their protectors. In the very | |||
imperfect accounts which have been published | |||
from Doomsday-book, of several of the towns | |||
of England, mention is frequently made, sometimes | |||
of the tax which particular burghers | |||
paid, each of them, either to the king, or to | |||
some other great lord, for this sort of protection, | |||